BR British Rail Crimson & Cream
Crimson and Cream Crimson Cream Blood & Custard Blood Custard Blood and
Custard BR British Rail Crimson & Cream Crimson and Cream Crimson Cream
Blood & Custard Blood Custard Blood and Custard BR British Rail Crimson
& Cream Crimson and Cream Crimson Cream Blood & Custard Blood Custard
Blood and Custard
London,
Brighton & South Coast Railway
Coulsdon &
Wallington ‘CW’
‘Elevated
Electric’ AC stock
& associated Pull-Push stock
Ten-car ‘CW’ formation near Purley on a Coulsdon
North service on 13th June 1925 |
Around the turn of the century, the London, Brighton & South
Coast Railway (LBSCR) were concerned about falling traffic receipts in the
suburban area and also wished to make economies in the costs of working their
system. So, they began investigations into the feasibility of working their
trains electrically. Electric operation of trains was now becoming quite
practical and was indeed already in operation on a number of railways abroad
and the LSWR had commenced limited electric operation in 1898 in the Waterloo
& City Railway tube line.
The construction of further electrified tube railways in London
and the parallel electrification of some competing tramway routes also spurred
these investigations by the LBSCR and the company obtained an Act of Parliament
in July 1903 to enable it to electrify parts of its system. Philip Dawson was
retained as a consulting electrical engineer to investigate the most suitable
system and from an early stage it was agreed that the system chosen should be
suitable for use on possible future extensions of the system beyond the
suburban area. Dawson took into account an earlier report to the LBSCR board
presented in 1902 by the Chief Engineer which pointed out a number of
disadvantages of the third rail system for the LBSCR network and presented a
report to the board in July 1904 recommending the adoption of a single‑phase
alternating current system at nominal 6,700 volts using overhead contact wire.
The system was envisaged as suitable for the whole suburban network and with
the possibility of later extensions should this be required.
Dawson was instructed to prepare plans for electrification of
the lines between Battersea Park and Peckham Rye via the South London line and
contracts were let in April 1905, awarded to the Allgemeine Elektricitats-Gesellschaft
(AEG) of Berlin; this company sub‑contracting the overhead line work to
Messrs R. W. Blackwell & Company of London, who in turn sub-contracted
further with British Thomson‑Houston Co providing switchgear and Johnson
& Philips also Siemens Bros providing cabling. Soon after these contracts
were let, the LBSCR decided to extend the electrification scheme from Peckham
Rye into London Bridge and from Battersea Park into Victoria so that the whole
South London line route was covered, and further contracts were let to cover
these extensions in March 1906. The rolling stock provision for the line was
awarded to the Metropolitan Amalgamated Carriage & Wagon Company of
Birmingham.
The Overhead
Power for the system was obtained from the London Electric
Supply Corporation's generating station at Deptford and supplied at nominal
6,700 volts, 25 hertz via cables direct to a switch room at Queens Road,
Peckham and a distribution room at Peckham Rye. Power was then distributed via
lineside cables to switch cabins located at each station which supplied the
overhead equipment. Wherever possible the current supply arrangements allowed
one line to be isolated without having to isolate the adjacent track. The
overhead lines were suspended at a contact height of 16' above rail level,
though this was reduced under certain low bridges to 13' 9" (where
there were ‘Dead’ sections) whilst in the vicinity of the platforms at Victoria
and London Bridge the height was raised to 19' 9" to give greater
clearances as staff still had to go onto carriage roofs to lamp oil lit stock
or light gas lamps in some gas lit stock.
The contact wire was suspended from two catenaries; these being
located one to each side and away from the centre line of the track to avoid
damage to the insulators from the blast of locomotive chimneys. The catenaries
were made of 12-strand galvanised steel and the droppers from these to the
contact wire were formed as a stiff ‘V’ shape and were clipped to the contact
wire by phosphor bronze clips. Droppers were spaced every 10' and held the
copper contact wire off centre above the track with alternate deviations of
9" from the track centre line; this zig-zagging of the contact wire was
designed to prevent the wire wearing a groove into the bow collectors of the
trains.
The structures supporting the catenaries were mostly steel
lattice gantries, the catenaries passing above these structures and supported
on porcelain insulators, though there were some variations in the vicinity of
overbridges. The overhead gantries were usually spaced about 150' apart, though
some gaps were as small as 50' and the longest was 210' owing to siting
difficulties.
Minimum clearance around the contact wire was specified at
3", though 4" was normally allowed, and the loading gauge height of
the LBSCR was set at 13' 6" so the minimum height of the contact wire
had to be set at 13' 9". As a consequence, there was a need for
‘Dead’ sections with the wire at this height under five overbridges on the
electrified lines.
Extending the System
The success of the LBSCR's overhead electrification of the South
London line in 1909 and the lines to Crystal Palace in 1911 and 1912 in
attracting additional passengers and economies of working led the LBSCR board
to plan for further extensions of the system to cover most of the suburban
lines, whilst further tentative plans for extensions to the coast at Brighton
& Eastbourne were also investigated.
Plans for the suburban lines were more advanced and the board
announced plans early in 1913 to electrify the following lines:
London Bridge
to Norwood Jct. via Forest Hill and including the Sydenham Spur to Crystal
Palace
Balham
Junction to Cheam via both Mitcham Jct. and West Croydon.
Tulse Hill
to Streatham Common/Streatham South Jct.
Norwood Jct.
to West Croydon.
Norwood
Jct./Selhurst to Coulsdon & Smitham Downs (later
known as Coulsdon North).
This covered the whole of the suburban system with the exception
of the branch line from Sutton to Epsom Downs, Bromley Jct. to Beckenham
Jct., the West Croydon to Wimbledon single line and the Wimbledon Loop from
Streatham South Jct., this last being joint property with the London &
South Western Railway.
Contracts for the electrification work were let, again to the
same contractors who had carried out the work on the two previous
electrification schemes, namely AEG (Berlin) for the electrification equipment
and Metropolitan Carriage, Wagon & Finance Co. Ltd for the rolling stock,
though once again some coaches would be supplied from the company's own
workshops at Lancing.
Works associated with the scheme in addition to the actual
electrification involved provision of a centre turnback siding at Wallington (where
it was planned that some electric trains would reverse) and the provision of a
centre island platform at Cheam (the line from Sutton having been recently
quadrupled in 1911) the electrification being taken through beyond the traffic
objective of Sutton to Cheam as there was space to provide turnback facilities
at Cheam (which Sutton lacked).
The track layout at the London end of Sutton station was also to
be revised with widening to allow parallel access to the Epsom Downs platforms
off the West Croydon line and the Epsom platforms off the Mitcham Jct. line, with
associated crossovers to allow interworking. Additional siding space for the
electric trains was also required, accessible from both Victoria and London
Bridge and a site on the Up side at Streatham Hill was identified as suitable.
Work on this scheme commenced quickly during 1913 with early
priority given to the Norwood Jct. to Cheam route and much of the overhead
equipment was installed between West Croydon and just outside Sutton (the
junction remodelling there was still to be carried out), whilst overhead
equipment was also erected between Tulse Hill and
Streatham South Jct.
New Electric Trains
Lancing Works was also given instructions to commence building
some of the rolling stock needed; 60 driving trailer composites being ordered
and work on these commenced during 1914. However, the outbreak of war in August
1914 brought work on the whole scheme to a halt, having a German contractor for
much of the equipment only adding to the difficulties.
Lancing had completed twelve of the driving trailers in 1914
when work was stopped with most of the coaches were stored minus their control
equipment. However, two were put into traffic as part of the CP fleet. A
further fifteen coaches were then built at Lancing during 1915 and again these
were stored, some only partially completed and no further progress was made
until December 1919 when work commenced again on a further batch of nine.
These driving trailers differed in one respect from those built
earlier for the CP services in that they had one more first and one less third-class
compartment, the layout being cab /four first /four third-class compartments.
Of the third batch of nine authorised, the last six reverted to the CP layout
of three first and five third compartments.
Work on the electrification had still not restarted into 1920
and Lancing were then asked to build a further batch of six driving trailers
(to the CW layout) and these batches of forty-two driving trailers (only two of
which were in service on the Crystal Palace lines) were then subject to a
decision taken to modify them to enable them to be put into traffic as steam
hauled stock, this involving fitting them with steam heating equipment and
modifying the lighting arrangements to enable them to be lit from dynamos. This
work commenced in about September 1920 and apart from the two coaches already
in use on AC services, all of the first three batches (of ten, fifteen and
nine) went into service for the first time as steam hauled stock, still
retaining their intended electric coach numbers.
The final batch of six were built suitable for steam operation
and went straight into service as such during the first half of 1921. All these
coaches retained their unused driving cabs with the glass replaced by opaque
windows as used in toilet compartments.
Post-war Electrification Work
Work was finally able to recommence on the electrification
scheme late in 1922, the board announcing in August that work would be rapidly
proceeded with and that the lines should be in use for electric trains during
the following year. Catenary supports began to be installed between Balham and
Gloucester Road Jct. almost at once and were completed through to Coulsdon
North by late in 1923, though the wiring was not fitted until later in 1924.
The gap between Norwood Fork Jct. and West Croydon was also
filled and the reversing siding at Wallington was completed (having lain partly
finished since 1914). The major work of remodelling the junctions at Sutton was
not carried out until January /February 1925 and the original plans to carry
the overhead to Cheam were abandoned, the wires terminating in the Epsom Downs
platforms at Sutton, though they extended a short way towards Belmont to allow
electric trains to shunt across to the Up line.
All four lines were electrified from Balham through to Purley,
though the Main lines were to be rarely used by electric trains south of East
Croydon. The overheads were extended a few hundred yards south of Purley on the
Local lines, again to allow trains to reverse and bay platforms at South
Croydon and some sidings at Purley and East Croydon were also equipped with
wires to allow operating flexibility at times of disruption.
However, no further work was carried out on the routes from
South Bermondsey Jct. to Norwood Jct. via Forest Hill (along with the Sydenham
Spur) or from Streatham South Jct. to Sutton via Mitcham Jct., these parts of
the original LBSCR plan then being abandoned. Some of the wiring which had been
installed in 1914 between Tulse Hill and Streatham
therefore did not have any regular electric services planned to use it. It was
then announced by the Southern Railway (who had by now inherited the scheme following
the grouping of the railways in 1923 and the winding-up of the LBSCR) at the
February 1925 General Meeting that electric services on the lines to Coulsdon
& Sutton would begin on 1st March 1925.
Power Supplies
Power supplies for the newly electrified lines were again taken
from London Electricity Supply Corporation with power being supplied at 6.7kV
AC to New Cross Gate where it was stepped-up by two 5000 kVA transformers to
64kV and transmitted in four 32kV lineside cables to a switch cabin at
Gloucester Road Jct. where it was stepped down again to nominal 6700kV and
distributed via other switch cabins to supply the overhead. Not all this
equipment was ready for the planned March opening date in 1925 and the new
services did not in fact commence until 1st April 1925, though
some trial running had been possible since 11th March 1925.
New Electric Services
The new electric services as introduced in April 1925 consisted
of a regular 20-minute frequency from Victoria to both Coulsdon North &
Sutton commencing at 6am to Coulsdon North and 6 10am to Sutton. This frequency
was reduced to ½ hourly between 11am and 1pm and after 9pm and the last train
from Victoria was at 12 10am.
On Saturdays the 20-minute frequency ran until 6pm when it
reduced to ½ hourly whilst on Sundays there was a ½ hourly service
all day. On the Crystal Palace line, two of the three trains each hour from
Victoria were extended, one each to East & West Croydon respectively. To
work the new services, twenty trains of new stock were required.
‘CW’ Rolling Stock
The original LBSCR plans for the rolling stock for these lines
is uncertain, whether further similar motor coaches to those used on the
Crystal Palace lines were intended is not clear. The enforced wartime delays to
the electrification meant that, apart from the driving trailer composites
produced at Lancing in 1914, 1915 and 1919, no new stock had been ordered, with
none at all from the intended builders Metropolitan Carriage, Wagon &
Finance Co. Ltd of Birmingham.
By December 1922, following a review of requirements, the LBSCR
was in a position to actually order the rolling stock required and settled on
having twenty trains formed of four trailer coaches, two each side of a motor
luggage van. These trains were to be formed of a driving trailer third at each
end and a trailer composite inside marshalled on each side of the motor luggage
van.
However, as forty-two driving trailer composites had already
been built at Lancing, and forty of them were now in service as steam hauled
coaches, it made sense to use these in the new trains. Had this been done then
these coaches could have been used to provide all the composite coaches in the
new trains and only forty new driving trailer thirds would need to be built.
However, only twenty were actually converted back to AC
operation, the remaining twenty (including the six built to the CP compartment
layout) remained in use as steam hauled coaches, never being used in AC trains.
[Quite why this was done remains a mystery, though it may have been
influenced by restrictions on the overall train lengths of the new stock].
The forty-two coaches already constructed were built to the same
dimensions as the earlier CP stock, namely 8' 0" wide and
54' 0" long over bodywork. The 40 driving trailer thirds (as ordered)
were to the shorter length of 48' 0" and a further 20 trailer
composites, also to this length were also ordered to make up the train
formations.
The motor luggage vans were 38' 5" long over bodywork
and all these vehicles were loose coupled adding an extra 3' 7" to
their overall length and therefore giving vehicles with overall lengths of
57' 7" (one) 51' 7" (three) and 42' 0" (one)
which gave an overall length for a 5-car formation of 254' 4" and
508' 8" for two trains coupled together. The later standard length
for an 8-car SR suburban train (3 car motor - 2 car trailer - 3 car motor) was
about 515' and it may be possible that the need to keep the overall
length of the new stock down led to the decision not to use all of the
54' driving trailer composites but to build a further twenty trailer
composites to the shorter 48' length.
The orders as finally placed for construction of new rolling
stock (known as the CW stock) reflected a further degree of muddle, which is
perhaps not surprising in view of the many delays and changes to this scheme
and the transition from being an LBSCR project to one completed by the newly
formed Southern Railway, which was still struggling to put in place an overall
management strategy for its three former constituent parts and set standards
for further electrification schemes.
Metropolitan Carriage, Wagon and Finance Co. Ltd was eventually
asked to provide twenty-one motor luggage vans and also built three driving
trailer thirds (DTT) and a further three trailer composites (TC). Lancing works
were instructed to reconvert twenty of the existing CW driving trailer
composites (DTC) in use as steam stock to electric operation and to construct
the remaining thirty-seven DTTs and seventeen TCs required. However, although
all the 48' 0" underframes for these were fabricated at Lancing, the
final seventeen of the DTTs and seven of the TCs were built at Eastleigh on the
Lancing underframes.
LBSCR numbers had been reserved for all these new vehicles and Lancing produced vehicles carried these. However, both
MCW&F and Eastleigh outshopped their vehicles carrying new numbers
allocated by the SR. Furthermore, Lancing turned out their vehicles still in
LBSCR umber livery whilst those from Eastleigh and MCW&F were painted in SR
sage green livery so that it was not possible to form a complete train once
delivered all in one livery as there were no DTC coaches in SR colours.
Each 5-car train of CW stock was 254' 4" long and
weighed 158 tons and seated 64 first and 240 third class passengers.
‘CW’ Motor Luggage Vans
The motor luggage vans built at Saltley
comprised a small full width driver's cab at each end, behind which was an
equipment room 10' 3¾" long, there being a side corridor along one
side to allow the driver to pass through. At the centre of the vehicle was a
guard's and luggage compartment 9' 9" long. There was a side access
door on both sides of each cab incorporating a droplight window.
Both equipment compartments had a pair of double outward opening
doors each side, there were no windows in these doors, but that towards the cab
end had a set of ventilation louvres where a droplight would normally be found,
the other door being plain.
Two further sets of ventilation louvres were placed in the
bodyside between the cab and the louvered door, giving three matching sets of
louvres towards each end of the bodywork on each side. The guard's compartment
also had a pair of double doors each side, both these having droplights and
there was a further ¼ light window adjacent.
Both cab ends had an observation light each side, between which
was a sloping hood covering lights used to illuminate an enamel headcode plate
which could be clipped into the space between the two observation lights. A
whistle was mounted on the body pillar nearside of the driver’s observation
light. Below these windows was an electric light, above which was a short
horizontal spindle rod which could be rotated from within the cab to place a
red lens over the lamp so that both head and tail indications could be
displayed.
The usual AC air connections were placed on the cab end with two
pipes in the centre for Train and Main Reservoir pipes and a further one at
headstock level for the bow air system. Sockets were also provided on the
headstock for jumper connections to adjacent trailer vehicles. As these
vehicles were usually marshalled at the centre of trains these cabs were little
used but were provided to give flexibility when shunting and in theory could be
used at the leading end of a train if required.
Below the underframe between the bogies was the compressor and
an air blower for motor cooling. Both bogies were steel plate framed with a
wheelbase of 8' 9" and wheel diameter was 3' 7" and bogie
centres were at 21' 5". Four 250hp motors supplied by General
Electric Co. were fitted, one driving each axle.
On the roof there were four bows, two being used in a trailing
mode in each direction, these being raised /lowered by air pressure. Roof
equipment, which was all ‘live’ was surrounded by a wire mesh basket running
right round the perimeter of the roof. Each equipment room contained the main
transformers, high tension equipment, control contactors and air blower motors.
These vehicles were 38' 5" long over bodywork and 8' 9"
wide over footboards (these ran along the whole length of the vehicle), length
over buffers being 42' 0". They weighed 62 tons.
The bodysides had wooden beading with curved corners to
represent panelling and all were outshopped in SR livery with the vehicle
number and ‘Southern Railway’ displayed in yellow shaded lettering at cantrail
level whilst the word ‘Guard’ appeared on one of the luggage van doors. The SR
issued diagram number 830 for these vehicles.
‘CW’ Driving Trailers
The driving trailer thirds consisted of a small full width cab
with side door access. The door incorporated a droplight, there being no other
side window to the cab. The cab end arrangement was virtually identical to that
of the motor luggage van described above. Behind the cab were eight third class
compartments all with the rather narrow width of 5' 2.5/8".
Underframes were rod-trussed and the bogies were of 8' 0" wheelbase.
Wooden beading along the bodyside with curved corners divided the bodyside into
smaller panels. These vehicles seated 80 third and weighed 24 tons and were
allocated the SR diagram number 738, though some were delivered bearing their LBSCR
carriage numbers.
The driving trailer composites used in the CW stock had all been
built earlier at Lancing and been altered for use as steam-hauled carriages
pending the completion of the electrification. To make them suitable for
electric use they were returned to Lancing and the steam heaters removed and
replaced with electric heaters, the braking system altered to a two-pipe system
and the lighting altered to a 300v supply provided from the motor luggage van.
The cab also had to be fitted out with control equipment and the cab ends
provided with head/tail lights and whistles etc. The finished cab end layout
was virtually identical to those of the DTT and MLV coaches, again these cabs
were mostly marshalled intermediately within the train and were rarely used
other than for shunting.
Behind the cab were four first class compartments, each
6' 6.5/8" wide and four third compartments each 5' 8" wide.
These coaches therefore seated 32 first and 40 third and weighed 24 tons. They
were given SR diagram number 792, their LBSCR number having been 284 which was
altered to 118 when converted to steam operation, and all entered service
carrying their intended LBSCR carriage numbers and painted in LBSCR livery. The
cab end was marshalled outermost against the DTT.
‘CW’ Trailer Composites
The trailer composites had bodies virtually identical to those
of the DTCs except that they were mounted on a 48' underframe and the cab was
therefore omitted. They again had four first and four third compartments to the
same dimensions as those in the DTC coaches and weighed 24 tons and again
seated 32 first and 40 third. Their SR diagram number was 768. Those built at
Lancing entered service in LBSCR livery with their LBSCR numbers, whilst the
MCW&F and Eastleigh built examples were in SR livery and carried SR
carriage numbers. These coaches were marshalled with the third-class
compartments adjacent to the MLV.
Operation & Maintenance
Trains did not maintain fixed formations though their make-up
was constant and trains did get turned around in service so that the
intermediate cab of the DTC sometimes faced South and sometimes North. These
units were based at Selhurst depot for routine maintenance and received heavier
attention at Peckham Rye repair shops.
They almost certainly ran from time to time on the Crystal
Palace route at times of disruption, whether they could run in multiple with
the CP stock however is unknown. Also unknown is whether the overhead equipment
between Tulse Hill and Streatham Common which had no
regular electric services scheduled to use it, was actually available for use
for empty trains and stock movements. It would have been useful for movements
from Selhurst depot to Peckham Rye, but there was an alternative route
available via Crystal Palace.
As the CW stock became due for body overhauls they were hauled
to Lancing and a number of the LBSCR liveried coaches were repainted into SR
green and renumbered, but not all were done. Eventually it would have been
possible in theory to form nine 5-car trains all in green livery, the remaining
eleven still having at least one coach remaining in LBSCR colours.
Southern Railway & DC Electrification
The Southern Railway standardised on ‘750v’ DC Third Rail (as
the future electrification system) decided to convert the LBSCR overhead system
to Third Rail DC as soon as possible and plans were drawn up which involved the
conversion of the existing overhead lines during 1928 and 1929.
Extensions to the ex-LSWR ‘600v’ DC electrification had been
undertaken and major progress on electrifying the former SECR suburban lines made
in 1925/26. Certainly, AC overhead electrification was in its infancy at the
costs associated with modifying bridges and tunnels (particularly on the
South-Eastern) must have formed part of that decision towards DC traction.
This conversion work went forward quite quickly and by June 1928
DC workings had been introduced covering most of the services from London
Bridge, rendering the SL and most of the CP stock surplus; these trains being
withdrawn for conversion to further DC electric vehicles.
The CW stock continued in operation on services out of Victoria,
though some of the service patterns were amended at this time to fit in with
the new DC services. Further stages of DC conversion in 1929 saw the CW stock
progressively replaced and the last AC train ran from Victoria in the early
hours of 22nd September 1929, after which much of the overhead
wires were quickly removed, though some of the overhead support structures
survived in situ for many years.
[It is
believed the last AC OHLE gantry was at Wandsworth Common station (between
platforms 3 & 4 across the Slow Lines) and brackets exist within Crystal
Palace tunnel. In the retained cutting south of East Croydon, the recesses for
the OHLE gantries can be seen’ some being used for colour-light signal gantries].
Conversion to DC stock
The redundant CW rolling stock was taken to Peckham Rye for
electrical stripping before the passenger coaches were taken to the workshops
at Ashford, Lancing or Eastleigh where they were converted for use as DC
electric vehicles. The MLV vehicles were stored for some years between
Streatham Hill and Balham until being taken to Eastleigh in 1933/34 and rebuilt
as bogie goods brakevans.
The original guard's compartment remained, the former cabs and
equipment rooms being removed and replaced by open verandas. The original heavy
plate framed bogies (now devoid of motors) were retained as was some of the
flush panelling of the bodysides, and braking was converted to vacuum with two
brake cylinders mounted beneath the underframes.
Conversion of the passenger carriages of the CW stock to DC
operations involved all of the coaches and also included some of the twenty DTC
coaches built earlier at Lancing but never used in AC service. Four of the
fourteen in steam use were used, along with four of the six built with the CP
compartment layout.
Pull-Push Conversions
The remaining twelve which were never used in any form of
electric unit were later converted to steam pull‑and‑push trailers.
Of those converted, twenty-two became motor brake composites, converted at
Ashford for units nos.1750 ‑ 1753, 1755 ‑ 1772.
This involved removing the bodywork from the 54' underframe, these frames then
being lengthened to 62'.
The bodies had the former cab removed and one of third-class
compartments at the opposite end, this being replaced by a new cab and brakevan area. The bodies were then remounted onto the
lengthened frames (not necessarily their original one) giving a new coach with
a cab/van + 3 third + 4 first compartment layout. The last three conversions
were mounted on new 62' underframes from Lancing, their own lengthened ones
being reused elsewhere.
Trailer Set Conversions
The remaining four DTC coaches were converted at Lancing into
54' trailer thirds with little alteration other than downgrading the first-class
compartments to third and converting the former cab into a five-seat coupe
compartment. These vehicles were included in trailer sets nos.1181, 1184 /1185
& 1186.
Motor Brake (Third & Composite) Conversions
The forty DTT coaches from the CW stock were all converted into
motor brake thirds at either Eastleigh (ten) or Ashford (thirty), this
involving the removal of the bodies from the underframes which were then
lengthened to 62' and the removal of the original cab and its replacement by a
new cab and brakevan area. The altered bodies were
then remounted onto the longer frames (again, not their original ones) and
these coaches were used as parts of units nos.1728 ‑ 1736,
1740 ‑ 1770 & 1772. One of the rebuilt bodies was placed
onto a new 62' Lancing frame during rebuilding.
The twenty TC coaches were all converted to motor brake
composites, the work again being split between Eastleigh (10) and Ashford (10).
Bodies were again removed from underframes which were lengthened to 62'. The
bodies had the endmost third compartment removed and replaced by a new cab
& brakevan area. All were remounted onto
lengthened underframes (usually not their own) and these rebuilds were included
in units nos.1728 ‑ 1736, 1740 ‑ 1749 &
1754.
Driving Trailer Composite Conversions
The six DTC coaches built at Lancing in 1919 to the CP
compartment layout (3F/5T) but not used in AC trains also had four of them used
for DC electric conversion, the other two remaining as steam hauled stock.
These four became trailer composites, all being taken to Ashford for conversion
where the bodies were removed from their underframes and the original disused
cab removed. A further first-class compartment was added at this end and a
further third-class at the other end resulting in vehicles with four first and
six third-class compartments. One was remounted onto a lengthened frame whilst
the other three went onto new 62' Lancing frames and these were then included
in units nos.1769 ‑ 1772.
Details of all the ‘CW’ stock vehicles are shown in the
following tables.
Motor Luggage Vans
Built by
MCW&F to SR diagram number 830. All withdrawn in 1929 and later converted
to bogie goods brakevans at Eastleigh. HO No.664 was
issued to convert all these vans to timber trucks, this was then cancelled and
replaced by HO No. E772 for a prototype conversion to a bogie goods brakevan (No.10108). The remainder were then done under HO
No. E790, the new diagram number of the conversions was 1580.
‘CW’ Motor Luggage Vans |
||||||
SR |
Date |
Date Converted |
New |
Withdrawn Date |
Withdrawn |
Dept. Use |
10101 |
Dec-23 |
Aug-34 |
56272 |
|
|
DS56272 |
10102 |
Dec-23 |
Jul-34 |
56273 |
|
|
DS56273 |
10103 |
Dec-23 |
Dec-34 |
56274 |
? |
|
|
10104 |
Dec-23 |
Jul-34 |
56275 |
? |
|
|
10105 |
Dec-23 |
Oct-34 |
56276 |
? |
|
|
10106 |
Dec-23 |
Mar-34 |
56261 |
? |
|
|
10107 |
Dec-23 |
Nay-34 |
56262 |
? |
|
|
10108 |
Dec-23 |
Sep-33 |
56263 |
? |
|
|
10109 |
Jan-24 |
Jun-34 |
56264 |
? |
|
|
10110 |
Jan-24 |
Aug-34 |
56277 |
|
|
DS56277 |
10111 |
Jan-24 |
Jan-35 |
56278 |
Aug-43 |
|
|
10112 |
Jan-24 |
Mar-34 |
56265 |
? |
|
|
10113 |
Jan-24 |
Apr-34 |
56266 |
? |
|
|
10114 |
Jan-24 |
Mar-34 |
56267 |
? |
|
|
10115 |
Jan-24 |
Apr-34 |
56268 |
? |
|
|
10116 |
Jan-24 |
Jul-34 |
56279 |
? |
|
|
10117 |
Mar-24 |
Nay-34 |
56269 |
? |
|
|
10118 |
Mar-24 |
Sep-34 |
56270 |
Aug-59 |
|
DS56270 |
10119 |
Apr-24 |
Oct-34 |
56280 |
? |
|
|
10120 |
Apr-24 |
Mar-34 |
56271 |
? |
|
|
10121 |
Apr-24 |
Aug-34 |
56281 |
Dec-58 |
Ashford Jan-59 |
DS56281 |
10111 was lost to enemy action (location
unknown). |
The passenger
vehicles converted for DC use virtually all had their bodies split from their
underframes and the latter were then lengthened (at Lancing). Most bodies did
not go back to their original frames, in the following tables, the new DC
number of the body is shown above the number of the DC vehicle under which the
underframe of the vehicle was reused.
Driving Trailer Composites
All built at
Lancing to the CP compartment layout (Cab/3F/5T) and put into use as steam
vehicles. LBSCR diagram Nos.285, SR diagram Nos.792 (electric) and 352 (steam).
None ever saw use in AC units but four were converted as TCs for DC operation
in 1930 and the remaining the remaining two steam vehicles were converted in
1932 for use in Pull-and-Push sets.,
‘CW’ Driving Trailer Composites |
|||||||||
LBSCR |
Date |
SR Steam No. |
SR ‘AC’ No. |
Date Renum. |
Date Rebuilt |
Works |
SR ‘DC’ No. |
Unit |
Type |
4107 |
Mar-21 |
6265 |
- |
Nov-25 |
28-Jun-30 |
AFD |
9480 |
1769 |
TC |
4108 |
Mar-21 |
6266 |
- |
Apr-25 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9481 |
1770 |
TC |
4109 |
Mar-21 |
6267 |
- |
Oct-27 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9483 |
1772 |
TC |
4110 |
Mar-21 |
6268 |
- |
Jul-27 |
Jun-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2193 for set
759 |
|||
4111 |
Mar-21 |
6269 |
- |
Oct-26 |
Jun-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2194 for set
751 |
|||
4112 |
Mar-21 |
6270 |
- |
Oct-26 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9482 |
1771 |
TC |
For further details of the steam
Pull-and-Push conversions, see later notes. |
Driving Trailer Composites
All built at Lancing. Nearly all stored
uncompleted until late in 1920 when put into service as steam stock. LBSCR
diagram Nos.284 (electric) and 118 (steam), SR diagram Nos. 792 (electric) and
352 (steam). Twenty reconverted to AC operation in 1925, whilst a further
twenty remained in steam use. Only those shown with an SR AC number were
repainted into SR livery whilst in AC service.
Most converted in 1930 to DC use, many
as MBC coaches and four at TT coaches.
The steam survivors were converted in
1931/32 for use in Pull-and-Push sets.
‘CW’ Driving Trailer Composites |
|||||||||
LBSCR |
Date |
SR Steam No. |
SR ‘AC’ No. |
Date Renum. |
Date Rebuilt |
Works |
SR ‘DC’ No. |
Unit |
Type |
4077 |
1913 |
- |
- |
- |
Mar-30 |
LANC |
9292 |
1186 |
TT |
4078 |
1914 |
- |
9896 |
May-24 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8886 |
1751 |
MBC |
4079 |
1914 |
- |
- |
- |
Apr-30 |
AFD |
9803 |
1768 |
MBC |
4080 |
1914 |
- |
- |
- |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
9801 |
1766 |
MBC |
4081 |
1914 |
- |
- |
- |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8898 |
1763 |
MBC |
4082 |
1914 |
- |
9900 |
May-24 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8891 |
1756 |
MBC |
4083 |
1914 |
- |
- |
- |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8899 |
1764 |
MBC |
4084 |
1914 |
Used as part of Crystal Palace fleet
from new in 1914 |
|||||||
4085 |
1914 |
Used as part of Crystal Palace fleet
from new in 1914 |
|||||||
4086 |
1914 |
- |
9902 |
May-24 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8887 |
1752 |
MBC |
4087 |
1914 |
- |
9903 |
May-24 |
Apr-30 |
AFD |
9802 |
1767 |
MBC |
4088 |
1914 |
- |
- |
- |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8900 |
1765 |
MBC |
4089 |
1915 |
- |
- |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8888 |
1753 |
MBC |
4090 |
1915 |
- |
- |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8896 |
1761 |
MBC |
4091 |
1915 |
- |
- |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8895 |
1760 |
MBC |
4092 |
1915 |
- |
9908 |
May-24 |
Feb-30 |
LANC |
9282 |
1181 |
TT |
4093 |
1915 |
- |
9909 |
May-24 |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8897 |
1762 |
MBC |
4094 |
1915 |
- |
- |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8893 |
1758 |
MBC |
4095 |
1915 |
- |
- |
- |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8885 |
1750 |
MBC |
4096 |
1915 |
- |
9912 |
May-24 |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8894 |
1759 |
MBC |
4097 |
1915 |
- |
|
May-24 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8890 |
1755 |
MBC |
4098 |
1915 |
|
9914 |
May-24 |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8892 |
1757 |
MBC |
4099 |
1915 |
6251 |
- |
Oct-24 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9806 |
1771 |
MBC |
4100 |
1915 |
6252 |
- |
Nov-24 |
Apr-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2186 for set
756 |
|||
4101 |
1915 |
6253 |
- |
Jun-25 |
May-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2187 for set
758 |
|||
4102 |
1915 |
6254 |
- |
Nov-26 |
Mar-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2188 for set
755 |
|||
4103 |
1915 |
6255 |
- |
Apr-27 |
Oct-31 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2189 for set
754 |
|||
4104 |
Dec-19 |
6256 |
- |
Sep-24 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9805 |
1770 |
MBC |
4105 |
Dec-19 |
6257 |
- |
Oct-27 |
Mar-31 |
Conv to steam P&P DTC 6939 for set
649 |
|||
4106 |
Dec-19 |
6258 |
- |
c.Oct-26 |
Apr-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2190 for set
757 |
|||
4113 |
Jun-21 |
6259 |
- |
Dec-24 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9807 |
1772 |
MBC |
4114 |
Jun-21 |
6260 |
- |
May-25 |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
9804 |
1769 |
MBC |
4115 |
Jun-21 |
6261 |
- |
Jul-27 |
Mar-31 |
Conv to steam P&P DTC 6940 for set
650 |
|||
4116 |
Jun-21 |
6262 |
- |
Aug-25 |
Apr-32 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2191 for set
753 |
|||
4117 |
Jun-21 |
6263 |
- |
Aug-26 |
Aug-26 |
Conv to steam P&P DTC 6941 for set
651 |
|||
4118 |
Jun-21 |
6264 |
- |
Jun-27 |
Jun-27 |
Conv to steam P&P TT 2192 for set
752 |
|||
For further details of the steam
Pull-and-Push conversions, see later notes. |
Trailer Composites
Those built with LBSCR numbers remained
in this livery whilst in AC service.
Those built with SR numbers were in SR
livery (their intended LBSCR numbers are shown in italics and were never
carried). SR diagram No. 768.
All subsequently converted for DC
operation as MBC coaches.
‘CW’ Trailer Composites |
||||||||
LBSCR |
Date |
Builder. |
SR ‘AC’ |
Date Rebuilt |
Works |
SR ‘DC’ |
Unit |
Type |
4119 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-29 |
AFD |
8863 |
1728 |
MBC |
4120 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-29 |
ELGH |
8875 |
1740 |
MBC |
4121 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jul-29 |
ELGH |
8879 |
1744 |
MBC |
4122 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Sep-29 |
AFD |
8866 |
1731 |
MBC |
4123 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jul-29 |
AFD |
8867 |
1732 |
MBC |
4124 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8870 |
1735 |
MBC |
4125 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8882 |
1747 |
MBC |
4126 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8881 |
1746 |
MBC |
4127 |
Jan-24 |
LANC |
- |
Jul-29 |
AFD |
8868 |
1733 |
MBC |
4128 |
Jun-24 |
LANC |
- |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8884 |
1749 |
MBC |
4129 |
Nov-23 |
LANC |
9655 |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8880 |
1745 |
MBC |
4130 |
Nov-23 |
LANC |
9656 |
Sep-29 |
AFD |
8865 |
1730 |
MBC |
4131 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
9657 |
Jul-29 |
ELGH |
8878 |
1743 |
MBC |
4132 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
9658 |
Jun-29 |
AFD |
8864 |
1729 |
MBC |
4133 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9661 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8871 |
1736 |
MBC |
4134 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9662 |
Jun-29 |
ELGH |
8877 |
1742 |
MBC |
4135 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9663 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8889 |
1754 |
MBC |
No. not allocated |
Dec-23 |
MCWF |
9672 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8869 |
1734 |
MBC |
No. not allocated |
Dec-23 |
MCWF |
9673 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8883 |
1748 |
MBC |
No. not allocated |
Dec-23 |
MCWF |
9674 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8876 |
1741 |
MBC |
Driving Trailer Thirds
Those built with LBSCR numbers remained
in this livery whilst in AC service.
Those built with SR numbers were in SR
livery (their intended LBSCR numbers are shown in italics and were never
carried). SR diagram no. 738.
All subsequently converted for DC
operation as MBT coaches.
‘CW’ Driving Trailer Thirds |
||||||||
LBSCR |
Date |
Builder. |
SR ‘AC’ |
Date Rebuilt |
Works |
SR ‘DC’ |
Unit |
Type |
3268 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8735 |
1758 |
MBT |
3269 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jan-30 |
ELGH |
8731 |
1754 |
MBT |
3270 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jul-29 |
AFD |
8702 |
1733 |
MBT |
3271 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8714 |
1745 |
MBT |
3272 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-29 |
ELGH |
8743 |
1766 |
MBT |
3273 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-29 |
ELGH |
8711 |
1742 |
MBT |
3274 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8717 |
1748 |
MBT |
3275 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8738 |
1761 |
MBT |
3276 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Sep-29 |
ELGH |
8712 |
1743 |
MBT |
3277 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8720 |
1751 |
MBT |
3278 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-29 |
AFD |
8698 |
1729 |
MBT |
3279 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8715 |
1746 |
MBT |
3280 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
8749 |
1772 |
MBT |
3281 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8733 |
1756 |
MBT |
3282 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-29 |
AFD |
8697 |
1728 |
MBT |
3283 |
Dec-23 |
LANC |
- |
Jun-30 |
AFD |
8746 |
1769 |
MBT |
3284 |
Jun-24 |
LANC |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8736 |
1759 |
MBT |
3285 |
Jun-24 |
LANC |
- |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8722 |
1753 |
MBT |
3286 |
Jun-24 |
LANC |
- |
Feb-30 |
AFD |
8737 |
1760 |
MBT |
3287 |
Jun-24 |
LANC |
- |
Jul-29 |
AFD |
8701 |
1732 |
MBT |
No. not allocated |
Dec-23 |
MCWF |
- |
Jul-29 |
ELGH |
8713 |
1744 |
MBT |
No. not allocated |
Dec-23 |
MCWF |
- |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8718 |
1749 |
MBT |
No. not allocated |
Dec-23 |
MCWF |
- |
Sep-29 |
AFD |
8700 |
1731 |
MBT |
3288 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9172 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8734 |
1757 |
MBT |
3289 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9173 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8721 |
1752 |
MBT |
3290 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9174 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8703 |
1734 |
MBT |
3291 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9175 |
Apr-30 |
AFD |
8745 |
1768 |
MBT |
3292 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9176 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8719 |
1750 |
MBT |
3293 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9177 |
Jun-29 |
ELGH |
8709 |
1740 |
MBT |
3294 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9178 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8705 |
1736 |
MBT |
3295 |
Nov-23 |
ELGH |
9179 |
Aug-29 |
AFD |
8704 |
1735 |
MBT |
3296 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9180 |
Sep-29 |
AFD |
8699 |
1730 |
MBT |
3297 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9181 |
Apr-30 |
AFD |
8744 |
1767 |
MBT |
3298 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9182 |
Aug-29 |
ELGH |
8716 |
1747 |
MBT |
3299 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9183 |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8740 |
1763 |
MBT |
3300 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9184 |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8741 |
1764 |
MBT |
3301 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9185 |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8739 |
1762 |
MBT |
3302 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9186 |
Jun-29 |
ELGH |
8710 |
1741 |
MBT |
3303 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9187 |
Mar-30 |
AFD |
8742 |
1765 |
MBT |
3304 |
Feb-24 |
ELGH |
9188 |
Jan-30 |
AFD |
8732 |
1755 |
MBT |
Driving Trailer Composites
(Steam Hauled Coaches)
The following section gives a brief summary of the history of
the twelve ‘CW’ driving trailer composites which entered service as steam
hauled coaches and were in fact never used in electric units. Ten of these were
to LBSCR diagram number 118, later SR diagram number 352. These consisted of
cab (disused), four first and four third-class compartments. The cab was
4' 0½" wide, the first-class compartments 6' 6.5/8" wide
and the thirds 5' 8" wide.
The remaining two coaches were built to the ‘CP’ layout with
three first class compartments (again 6' 6.5/8" wide) and five third
class compartments each 5' 10" wide. These coaches were to LBSCR
diagram number 100, later SR diagram number 353.
All these coaches had been renumbered from their ‘electric’
numbers into a new ‘steam’ series during body overhauls at Lancing at various
dates between 1924 and 1927 when they were repainted into SR green livery. They
retained the disused cab (still retaining the end windows and now used as a
luggage compartment) during these overhauls and continued in use in loco-hauled
trains on the former LBSCR system at this stage as they still retained their
air braking system. These initial renumbering’s were as follows:
‘CW’ Driving Trailer Composites |
|||||||
Electric |
Steam |
Date Renum. |
Type |
P&P |
Set |
Type |
Withdrawal |
4100 |
6252 |
Nov-24 |
CW |
2186 |
756 |
TT |
8-Jul-44 |
4101 |
6253 |
Jun-25 |
CW |
2187 |
758 |
TT |
2-Aug-58 |
4102 |
6254 |
Nov-26 |
CW |
2188 |
755 |
TT |
29-Nov-58 |
4103 |
6255 |
Apr-27 |
CW |
2189 |
754 |
TT |
26-Jan-38 |
4105 |
6257 |
18-Oct-27 |
CW |
6939 |
649 |
DTBC |
18-Aug-37 |
4106 |
6258 |
Oct-26 |
CW |
2190 |
757 |
TT |
18-Jul-59 |
4110 |
6268 |
Jul-27 |
CP |
2193 |
759 /37 |
TT |
c.Dec-60 |
4111 |
6269 |
Oct-26 |
CP |
2194 |
751 |
TT |
13-Dec-39 |
4115 |
6261 |
21-Jul-27 |
CW |
6940 |
650 |
DTBC |
19-Sep-59 |
4116 |
6262 |
Aug-25 |
CW |
2191 |
753 |
TT |
28-Mar-59 |
4117 |
6263 |
Aug-26 |
CW |
6941 |
651 |
DTBC |
4-Oct-58 |
4118 |
6264 |
9-Jun-27 |
CW |
2192 |
752 |
TT |
13-Dec-39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 1931, three of these
coaches were converted (two at Brighton and one at Lancing) into pull-and-push
driving trailer brake composites, these all being former CW layout coaches.
Conversion involved alteration to vacuum braking and fitment of the air control
system between the cab and the locomotive.
The former cab and adjacent first-class compartment were merged
into a cab and brakevan area 10' 8" long. A
pair of doors were provided each side, that for the guard opening inwards. The
cab end retained the two observation windows, distinguishing these coaches from
other LBSCR push-and-pull trailers which had four smaller cab windows on the
cab end.
As modified these coaches then seated 24 first and 40 third and
were renumbered 6939 - 6941. Each coach was paired with an 8-compartment third
and became pull-and-push sets 649 - 651 allocated to the Eastern Section as
reliefs. The thirds in sets 649 and 650 were ex. LSWR coaches, whilst that
in set 651 was ex. LBSCR No. 1960. The LSWR coach in set 650 was later
replaced by an LBSCR coach no. 2087. Conversion details were as follows:
Number |
Date |
Works |
6939 |
18-Mar-31 |
Brighton |
6940 |
27-May-31 |
Brighton |
6941 |
20-May-31 |
Lancing |
The remaining nine coaches (seven to the CW layout and two to
the CP layout) were all converted to trailer thirds late in 1931 /early 1932.
This involved altering the braking to vacuum and downgrading all the
compartments to third-class and installation of pipework for the air control
system of the pull-and-push sets.
The disused cab had already been converted to a luggage
compartment and this was retained, in some sets this was marshalled against the
locomotive whilst in others it was located at the centre of the two-coach set
against the driving trailer. These trailer thirds, now seating 80 third, were
then included in pull-and-push sets 751 - 759 (not in number order) replacing
earlier similar ex. LBSCR 8-compartment thirds. These sets were then allocated
to the Central & Eastern section, working at various times on all the
branch lines where pull-and-push working was in operation.
Further details of these pull-and-push sets are shown in the
following tables.
Pull-and-Push Sets
LBSCR ‘Arc-roof’ Sets Nos.649 -
651
These sets were formed in 1931 using newly-converted driving
trailer brake composites (ex ‘CW’ DTC coaches) and an 8-compartment third, two
of these (498 and 499) being ex. LSWR coaches whilst the remaining one
(1960) was an ex. LBSCR coach. TT 498 was withdrawn 31st August
1932 and replaced by similar 500.
All three of these LSWR coaches had been built at Eastleigh
during 1902, on 48' underframes and with electric lighting from new. Their
original LSWR numbers were nos.551 (498), 553 (499) and 560 (500).
The LBSCR coach 1960 had been built at Brighton in June 1903 and
was also new with electric lighting. The eight compartments were all
5' 9½" wide. The coach was given its SR number in July 1926.
Overall sets nos.649 ‑ 651 were 103' 2"
long and weighed about 45 tons, seating 24 first and 120 third.
The LSWR coach 499 in set no.650 was withdrawn in October 1934
and part of its bodywork converted into a DC electric coach, MBT 9867 for
2 NOL unit no.1819. It was replaced by a further ex. LBSCR 8-compartment
third 2087, this coach having been built as LBSCR no. 1215 about June 1895 by
contractors Brown, Marshalls & Co. Ltd of Birmingham. It was new with gas
lighting.
This coach had been renumbered 2087 by the SR in July 1927 and
the body was then remounted onto a new 48' underframe during 1930 when the
coach was also converted to electric lighting. It was then further modified for
pull-and-push working in 1932 and formed into set 650 from October 1934.
These sets ran in SR green livery, the two survivors through
into the BR era being repainted in red livery about 1950, though set 651 may
have reverted to green before withdrawal. Set 650 was scrapped at Newhaven late
in 1959 still in the red livery applied in 1950.
Pull-Push Sets No.649-651 |
|
|||||||
SR |
Formed |
DBTC |
TT |
Reformed Date |
Withdrawn |
Scrapped |
Notes |
|
Diag. No. |
|
|
12 (LSWR)
|
|
|
|
|
|
649 |
Mar-31 |
6939 |
|
Mar-31 |
18-Aug-37 |
18-Aug-37 (body) |
U/frame to 9140 |
|
650 |
Mar-31 |
6940 |
|
Mar-31 |
19-Sep-59 |
Newhaven |
|
|
Diag. No. |
|
|
(LBSCR 48’) |
|
|
|
|
|
651 |
Mar-31 |
6941 |
1960 |
Mar-31 |
4-Oct-58 |
Newhaven |
|
|
Allocations of Pull-Push Sets Nos.649-651
These sets then worked on the Allhallows
and Westerham branches; later could sometimes be seen based at Horsham for
services to both Guildford & Brighton. Later sample allocations were as
follows:
Date |
Set 649 |
Set 650 |
Set 651 |
1931 |
SE Relief |
SE Relief |
SE Relief |
1934/5 |
Hythe |
Westerham |
SE Relief |
1939 |
|
Bexhill West |
Bexhill West |
1945 |
|
|
SE Relief |
Set
no.650 was working on the Ashford - Hastings/New Romney lines in Summer 1958.
LBSCR ‘Arc-roof’ Sets Nos.751-760
These sets were formed in late 1925 /early 1926. The DTBC Coaches
were all ex. LBSCR coaches which had been rebuilt at Lancing in 1909 and 1911.
The LBSCR converted ten coaches into pull-and-push driving trailers at this
time for use in the suburban area on branch line and shuttle services.
Each coach was formed
of a former five-compartment six-wheeled coach with the body remounted onto a
new 54' underframe. The compartments were 5' 10¼" wide. Two new first-class
compartments were then added, these being 6' 10½" wide and a cab and
luggage area at the end, 10' ¼" wide. The cab area was entered by a
single sliding door which slightly inset and slid back inside the luggage
compartment. The cab end had four quite deep observation windows arranged in
two pairs and the cab end was fully panelled. These coaches then weighed about
25 tons and seated 16 first and 50 third.
The final six conversions had identical bodies to the first
four, but the third-class compartment adjacent to the new firsts was also
fitted out as a further first (despite being to third class dimensions) so
these coaches seated 24 first and 40 third. They were numbered as 630 ‑ 639,
(630 ‑ 634 having the 2F/5T compartment layout).
These coaches were then put into service from October 1909,
usually operating in pairs with one marshalled each side of the locomotive on
suburban services. Early services worked were the Epsom Downs branch, with four
coaches allocated, two each based at Sutton and West Croydon, whilst their use
then spread to include local shuttles from Streatham to Wimbledon, West Croydon
to Wimbledon and West Croydon - Crystal Palace - Coulsdon North. All these cars
remained working on these services into SR days, the first to lose LBSCR umber
livery being 636 when it was repainted green and renumbered 6933 in April 1924.
The SR then decided to form ten two-coach pull-and-push sets
using these ten driving trailers paired with an 8-compartment 48' third.
These sets were formed between November 1925 and January 1926 and the DTBCs
were all renumbered as 6927 ‑ 6936 at this time, the coaches
being repainted in SR green livery at this stage.
The 8-compartment thirds used were also ex. LBSCR coaches and
were allocated to sets in the order mos.2061, 2039, 2002, 2038, 2007, 1995,
1967, 1963 and 2110. These had all been built at Brighton between 1898 and
1904, one (1266) having been built with gas lighting and subsequently converted
to electricity by the LBSCR, whilst all the others had electric lighting from
new.
When formed these sets were therefore
107' 2" long overall and weighed about 46 tons. The first four seated
16 first and 130 third whilst the last six seated 24 first and 120 third. All
had the LBSCR air operated motor-train control system and retained Westinghouse
air brakes.
During August 1928 set no.754 was fitted
with vacuum braking (alongside the Westinghouse system) and was used to tour
around various motor-worked branch lines whilst the SR decided on which control
system from the former constituents should be adopted as standard for the SR
system.
The LBSCR air system was found to be the
most reliable, the wire system used by the LSWR and the rotating underfloor rod
system used by the SECR then being abandoned. However, the LBSCR sets were
altered to vacuum braking between November 1929 and February 1930, though
retaining the air operated control system.
Sets Nos.751-760 Reformations
During the early 1930's the large number
of former LBSCR 8-compartments thirds were being rapidly withdrawn, and this
included those allocated to sets nos.751 ‑ 760. They were all
therefore replaced between early 1931 and late 1932 by newer 8-compartment
thirds, these being the 9 surviving ‘CW’ driving trailer composites never used
for electric working. At this time the panelling on the cab ends of the DTBCs
was altered to plainer steel. Set no.760 was disbanded when its 8-compartment
third was withdrawn.
These sets were then allocated to the
Central and Eastern sections, with the majority initially working on the
Eastern section. A few were withdrawn in SR days but others survived into BR
ownership and were repainted into Crimson Lake livery about 1950, these last
not being withdrawn until 1958 /1959.
Set No.37 Reformation
When set no.759 was withdrawn in 1954,
its ex. ‘CW’ trailer third 2193 was transferred to Set no.37, replacing ex.
LSWR coach 608 which was withdrawn. The driving trailer in this set was
numbered 6410. This coach had started life as an SECR composite brake lavatory,
built at Ashford in July 1916 numbered 1342. It was 60' 1" long over
bodywork with bogie centres at 43' 6" and as construction took place
during the war, the bodysides were plain panelled with no mouldings. It
consisted of a guard's brake 12' 4½" wide, five third compartments each
6' 0" wide and two second compartments both 6' 5½" wide.
Between the second and third
compartments were two lavatories, side by side one serving the two second
compartments via a side corridor, the other three of the thirds, again via a side
corridor, this being on the opposite side to the corridor in the second-class
section of the coach. There was no access between the toilet compartments, the
width of these being 3' 8". If the brakevan
end was leading, the third corridor was on the offside, the second on the
nearside.
As a result of this odd arrangement, the
first two thirds were standard closed compartments each seating 10, the next
one seating 8, five along one side, three the other where the corridor
commenced, whilst the remaining two seated 6, with three-aside seating and the
corridor running past them. The second adjacent to the lavatory seated 6, again
with three-aside seating and the corridor running past, whilst the final second
at the coach end had a five aside seat across the coach end facing a
three-aside seat. Overall capacity was therefore 13 second and 40 third.
This coach was new with electric
lighting but no heating, though it was fitted with a through steam pipe. It was
allocated to ‘trio-set’ 198, this set being fitted with steam heaters in June
1921. The set was renumbered 630 by the SR in July 1927 and the coach was
renumbered 3530 at this time. This set was disbanded in 1941, possibly as a
result of enemy action damage and 3530 was then converted in June to a steam pull-and-push
driving trailer composite with four cab windows fitted into the brakevan end.
Both the lavatories were removed, though
the corridors survived leading nowhere. The second-class seating was upgraded
to first-class with the same layout so now the coach seated 13 first and 40
third. The coach was then renumbered as 6410 in the brake composite series and
was a loose vehicle until formed with ex. LSWR third 608 as set no.37 in
May 1947, allocated to the Central Section. Third 608 was then withdrawn in
July 1954 and replaced by 2193 as mentioned above.
Pull-Push Sets No.751-760 |
||||||
SR |
Formed |
DBTC |
TT |
Reformed Date |
Withdrawn |
Scrapped |
751 |
Dec-25 |
6927 |
|
Oct-25 |
13-Dec-39 |
DTBC? |
752 |
Nov-25 |
6928 |
|
Oct-25 |
13-Dec-39 |
DTBC ? |
753 |
Nov-25 |
6929 |
|
Oct-25 |
28-Mar-59 |
Newhaven |
754 |
Nov-25 |
6930 |
|
Oct-25 |
26-Jan-38 |
? |
755 |
Nov-25 |
6931 |
|
Oct-25 |
29-11-58 |
Newhaven |
756 |
Dec-25 |
6932 |
|
Oct-25 |
8-Jul-44 |
New Cross Gate |
757 |
Jan-26 |
6933 |
|
Oct-25 |
18-Jul-59 |
Newhaven |
758 |
Fe-26 |
6934 |
|
Oct-25 |
2-Aug-58 |
Lancing? |
759 |
Jan-26 |
6935 |
|
Oct-25 |
3-Jul-54 |
‘London Bridge’ |
Notes |
# |
54ft trailer to electric stock 1925 |
||||
Pull-Push Set No. 37 |
||||||
SR |
Formed |
DBTC |
TT |
Reformed Date |
Withdrawn |
Scrapped |
Diag. No. |
|
|
19 (608) |
|
|
|
37 |
May-47 |
6410 |
|
Jun-41 |
c.Dec-60 |
Newhaven |
Allocations of Pull-Push Sets Nos.751-759
Initial allocations for these sets was to the Central/Eastern sections. In 1935 sets were
allocated as follows:
751 |
Gillingham (Relief) |
756 |
Paddock Wood |
752 |
Horsham |
757 |
Gillingham |
753 |
Cranleigh |
758 |
Gillingham |
754 |
Ashford |
759 |
Gillingham |
755 |
Relief (Eastern) |
|
|
Set no.758 had worked Ford - Littlehampton prior to moving to
the Eastern section.
1939
Following withdrawal of sets 751 and 752 in December 1939
(probably due to wartime service cuts) both the ex. ‘CW’ trailer thirds were
taken into departmental stock in July 1940, both being allocated to the loco
running department.
2192 became
1546S allocated to Bournemouth Central Loco Depot and withdrawn during 1948.
2194 became
1548S allocated to St Leonards Loco Depot, withdrawn ????
1941
In 1941 set no.753 was allocated to the
Central section; sets nos.755 ‑ 759 to the Eastern section.
1944
In 1944 set no.753 was allocated to the
Central section, set no.755 to the Eastern section and sets nos.757 ‑ 759
to the Central section. Set no.755 was usually based at Ashford for Hastings /New
Romney services.
When set no.759 was withdrawn in Jul‑54,
the CW coach moved into set no.37 which was also a Central allocated set until
withdrawal. DTBC 6935 was broken-up by London Bridge C&W staff (exact location
unknown) 21st July 1954.
Set no.756 was withdrawn July 1944 (possibly the result of
enemy action damage) and both coach bodies broken‑up at New Cross
Gate 8th July 1944, the underframes being cut‑up
at Mitcham Jct.
Thanks go to research
author John Atkinson, webpage author, editorial and additional information from
C.Watts along with the many photographers listed
below their images. |
In memory of J.F. Watts
who recalled seeing the CP/CW stock in his childhood.
ALL TEXT PHOTOGRAPHS
ARE COPYRIGHT